Anguita, Pedro, Ingrid Bachmann, Lionel Bross, Claudio Elórtegui, María José Escobar, Paulina Ibarra, J. Carlos Lara, Fabián Padilla, y Patricia Peña. 2023. “El fenómeno de la desinformación: Revisión de experiencias internacionales y en Chile”. Informe 1. Comisión Asesora contra la Desinformación. https://bit.ly/3XyNhIR
Bareket, Orly, y Susan T. Fiske. 2023. “A Systematic Review of the Ambivalent Sexism Literature: Hostile Sexism Protects Men’s Power; Benevolent Sexism Guards Traditional Gender Roles”. Psychological Bulletin 149 (11-12): 637-98. https://doi.org/gtrjkr
Bosson, Jennifer K., Elizabeth C. Pinel, y Joseph A. Vandello. 2010. “The Emotional Impact of Ambivalent Sexism: Forecasts Versus Real Experiences”. Sex Roles 62:520-31. https://doi.org/d27vmg
Calderón-Ferrey, Martha, y Luis Gerardo Meza-Cascante. 2023. “Sexismo ambivalente: una realidad en el entorno universitario”. Investiga.TEC 16 (48): 20-23. https://bit.ly/3ASTx5w
De Geus, Roosmarijn, Elizabeth Ralph-Morrow, y Rosalind Shorrocks. 2022. “Understanding Ambivalent Sexism and Its Relationship with Electoral Choice in Britain”. British Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 1564-83. https://doi.org/ns33
Díaz Redondo, Rebeca P., Ana Fernández Vilas, Mateo Ramos Merino, Sonia María Valladares Rodríguez, Soledad Torres Guijarro, y Manar Mohamed Hafez. 2023. “Anti-Sexism Alert System: Identification of Sexist Comments on Social Media Using AI Techniques”. Applied Sciences 13 (7): 4341. https://doi.org/ns4n
Franceschet, Susan. 2008. “¿Promueven las cuotas de género los intereses de las mujeres? El impacto de las cuotas en la representación sustantiva de las mujeres”. En Mujer y política. El impacto de las cuotas de género en América Latina, editado por Marcela Ríos Tobar, 1a ed., 61-96. Santiago de Chile: Catalonia. https://bit.ly/4eKySyd
Freidenberg, Flavia, y Cristhian Uribe Mendoza. 2019. “Las reformas político-electorales en América Latina (2015-2018)”. Revista de Estudios Políticos, n.o 185 (septiembre), 191-223. https://doi.org/ns4b
Glick, Peter, y Susan T. Fiske. 1996. “The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (3): 491-512. https://doi.org/hb2
Glick, Peter, y Susan T. Fiske. 1997. “Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: Measuring Ambivalent Sexist Attitudes Toward Women”. Psychology of Women Quarterly 21 (1): 119-35. https://doi.org/c42s8g
Glick, Peter, y Susan T. Fiske. 2011. “Ambivalent Sexism Revisited”. Psychology of Women Quarterly 35 (3): 530-35. https://doi.org/cxxbd4
González-Bustamante, Bastián. 2020. “The Politics-Administration Dichotomy: A Case Study of the Chilean Executive during the Democratic Post-Transition”. Bulletin of Latin American Research 39 (5): 582-97. https://doi.org/ns4p
Gunaratnam, Yasmin, y Carrie Hamilton. 2017. “Introduction the Wherewithal of Feminist Methods”. Feminist Review 115 (1): 1-12. https://doi.org/gf2rpf
Hornset, Norunn, y Indra de Soysa. 2022. “Does Empowering Women in Politics Boost Human Development? An Empirical Analysis, 1960–2018”. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 23 (2): 291-318. https://doi.org/ns4g
Inguanzo, Isabel, Bingbing Zhang, y Homero Gil de Zúñiga. 2021. “Online cultural backlash? sexism and political user-generated content”. Information, Communication & Society 24 (14): 2133-52. https://doi.org/gndhzc
Jha, Akshita, y Radhika Mamidi. 2017. “When does a compliment become sexist? Analysis and classification of ambivalent sexism using twitter data”. En Proceedings of the Second Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science, 7-16. Vancouver, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/ghtdpc
La Nación. 2016. “La CIA contó la muerte de Osama Ben Laden en 21 tuits”. La Nación, 2 de mayo de 2016, sec. El Mundo. https://bit.ly/3AH5FXk
Linabary, Jasmine R., y Stephanie A. Hamel. 2017. “Feminist Online Interviewing: Engaging Issues of Power, Resistance and Reflexivity in Practice”. Feminist Review 115 (1): 97-113. https://doi.org/gbhrzs
Long, Feiteng, Zi Ye, y Guohua Liu. 2024. “Economic Inequality Reduces Preferences for Competent Leaders”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 0 (0): 01461672241235381. https://doi.org/ns4q
McKay, Spencer, y Chris Tenove. 2021. “Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy”. Political Research Quarterly 74 (3): 703-17. https://doi.org/gg4q8t
Melander, Erik. 2005. “Political Gender Equality and State Human Rights Abuse”. Journal of Peace Research 42 (2): 149-66. https://doi.org/dqfgc9
Miranda-Leibe, Lucía, Beatriz Roque, y Matías Eyzaguirre. 2022. “Discursos sexistas acerca de los intereses de las mujeres en el Parlamento chileno: un desafío pendiente para la representación descriptiva y sustantiva de género”. Revista de ciencia política (Santiago) 42 (3): 617-44. https://doi.org/ns3p
Pal, Joyojeet, y A’Ndre Gonawela. 2017. “Studying political communication on Twitter: the case for small data”. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18: 97-102. https://doi.org/ggwqwf
Ríos Tobar, Marcela, ed. 2008. Mujer y política. El impacto de las cuotas de género en América Latina. 1a ed. Santiago de Chile: Catalonia. https://bit.ly/4eKySyd
Rodríguez-Sánchez, Francisco, Jorge Carrillo-de-Albornoz, y Laura Plaza. 2020. “Automatic Classification of Sexism in Social Networks: An Empirical Study on Twitter Data”. IEEE Access 8:219563-76. https://doi.org/gsb63p
Santos-Rios, Roi, Jesús Vilares, y Miguel A. Alonso. 2023. “Some experiments on the use of Natural Language Processing for sexism detection and classification in social media”. En Proceedings of V XoveTIC Conference. XoveTIC 2022, 24-19. https://doi.org/ns4k
Sarno, David. 2008. “Obama, the first social media president”. Los Angeles Times blog (blog). 18 de noviembre de 2008. https://bit.ly/4eMVTAY.
Weller, Katrin. 2014. “What Do We Get from Twitter—and What Not? A Close Look at Twitter Research in the Social Sciences”. Knowledge Organization 41 (3): 238-48. https://doi.org/gdz298
